This case involves a suspected fraud claim led by associate Rehana Ahmed, where Flint Bishop was disputing liability, causation and quantum.
Despite the claimant admitting under cross-examination that he had been “dishonest”, and that their vehicle was driveable after the accident, no repairs were actually carried out and they returned the hire vehicle earlier than recorded on the hire documents, the Deputy District Judge did not attach any weight to any of this and found in the claimant’s favour on all issues. Further, the defendant was refused permission to appeal.
Our insurer client did not want to incur the costs of the appeal without a second opinion and so asked for Counsel’s advice from their preferred chambers. The difficulty here was that the appeal would have to be on the finding of fact, which is extremely difficult and rare.
Counsel, of some 13 years call, gave success prospects at 15%. Rehana disagreed with Counsel’s advice and placed prospects of success estimate at approximately 60%. Rehana delivered a presentation to three senior people at our insurer client in order to convince them to run the appeal.