For support with compliance with the Bribery Act, please call us on 01332 226 130 or complete the form below.
Whilst many companies might feel more familiar with the requirements of The Bribery Act 2010 since it came into force last year, new changes mean that prosecutions are now more likely than ever.
|18 November 2012
Insight
With construction identified as a high-risk industry and many engineering contracts being international, prosecution for a breach of the Bribery Act is a real risk.
Firms will need to be aware of the new guidance on facilitation payments, hospitality and corporate self-reporting introduced by the Serious Fraud Office.
It has been suggested that the Serious Fraud Office wishes to make clear that it is an investigator and prosecutor, rather than a regulator.
As a result, a toughening of its position seems clear. For example, the Serious Fraud Office has now stated that “corporates cannot be seen to be allowed some special kid glove treatment”.
In line with this statement, the Serious Fraud Office has also stated that “there will be no presumption in favour of civil settlement in any circumstances” This makes prosecutions more likely.
The previous Guidance on facilitation payments, (payments made to smooth the way for transactions), and on examples of legitimate hospitality has been removed.
Whilst the Serious Fraud Office recognises that bona fide hospitality is an established and important part of doing business, they point out that there is a risk of bribes being disguised as hospitality.
As a result, it will deem companies to be using hospitality to encourage or reward improper performance where it is lavish, it lacks a clear legitimate business connection or it is concealed.
It remains a defence to a charge of failure to prevent bribery for a business to show that it has adequate procedures in place to prevent bribery.
If you have not already done so, we recommend that you put in place appropriate procedures. Existing policies should also be reviewed in light of this change in stance.
Just as important is to ensure that all procedures are followed. For example, it would be wise to record all accepted hospitality, (possibly above set levels), rather than taking a more ad hoc approach. By doing that, matters should not be missed, which is important because unreported hospitality might now be treated as having been “concealed”.
Related Services
Understand employer rights when employees have second jobs, including contracts, working time, conflicts of interest and dismissal.
Read More
New legal duties require organisations to handle data protection complaints correctly. Learn what you need to do now.
Read More
Download our probationary period resource pack to help prepare for the Employment Rights Act changes from January 2027.
Read More
Download expert guidance on UK trade union reforms and prepare your organisation for Employment Rights Act changes.
Read More
Employment law tips for employers managing absence, flexibility and inclusion during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
Read More
Guidance for employers on managing workplace distraction, excessive phone use and digital overload at work.
Read More
Key April 2026 changes to trade union recognition rules and what employers should do ahead of wider reforms later this year.
Read More
Government consultation begins on NDA restrictions under the Employment Rights Act 2025, with changes expected from 2027.
Read More
Employers can voluntarily publish menopause and gender pay gap action plans from April 2026 ahead of the 2027 legal requirement.
Read More
Understand SSP 2026 updates, employer responsibilities, and common pitfalls to keep your business compliant and protect staff rights.
Read More
How suppliers’ use of AI can create IP, data protection, and contractual risks, and how businesses can manage them.
Read More
EAT confirms employers should assess redundancies forward-looking, not retrospectively, when deciding if collective consultation is needed.
Read More