For further information or advice in relation to dealing with policies regarding employees experiencing menopausal symptoms, please contact our employment law specialists on 01332 226 155 or fill in the form below.
Conveyancing
Explore All ConveyancingCriminal Defence
Explore All Criminal DefenceEstate Planning
Explore All Estate PlanningEstate Administraion
Explore All Estate AdministraionDispute Resolution
Explore All Dispute ResolutionFamily & Matrimonial
Explore All Family & MatrimonialMotoring & Driving Offences
Explore All Motoring & Driving OffencesResidential Property
Explore All Residential PropertyResidential Property Disputes
Explore All Residential Property DisputesWills, Trusts & Estate Disputes
Explore All Wills, Trusts & Estate DisputesAgriculture
Explore All AgricultureBusiness Recovery
Explore All Business RecoveryCharities & social enterprises
Explore All Charities & social enterprisesCommercial Disputes
Explore All Commercial DisputesCommercial Law & Contracts
Explore All Commercial Law & ContractsCommercial Property
Explore All Commercial PropertyCorporate & Finance
Explore All Corporate & FinanceData Protection
Explore All Data ProtectionDebt Services
Explore All Debt ServicesEcclesiastical Law
Explore All Ecclesiastical LawEducation Law
Explore All Education LawEmployment Law
Explore All Employment LawFamily Businesses
Explore All Family BusinessesFinance Dispute Resolution
Explore All Finance Dispute ResolutionFinancial & Business Crime
Explore All Financial & Business CrimeInsurance Litigation
Explore All Insurance LitigationIntellectual Property
Explore All Intellectual PropertyLicensing
Explore All LicensingRegulatory & Corporate Defence
Explore All Regulatory & Corporate Defence
A recent case in the Employment Tribunal, Lynskey -v- Direct Line, provides some important lessons for employers in managing employees whose performance is worsening as a result of menopausal symptoms.
27 September 2023
Case Study
This case saw substantial compensation being awarded to Ms Lynskey, who was employed by Direct Line from 2016 to 2022 and had enjoyed a “very good” performance rating before entering the menopause.
In 2019, Ms Lynskey started to experience brain fog and had difficulty concentrating, became less emotionally resilient and was prone to tears. She was diagnosed with a hormone imbalance and depression, and began taking anti-depressants to reduce the effects of her symptoms. Her employer was aware of this.
Following a client call that she handled badly, Ms Lynskey was transferred to a role that was deemed to be less challenging. Complaints still followed about her attitude and approach. She was refused refresher training, denied a pay rise and her performance rating dropped to “needs improvement”. This was, hitherto, unusual for her.
Ms Lynskey’s line manager refused to accept that her menopausal symptoms were the underlying cause of her difficulties and, instead, criticised her for stopping the anti- depressants. She received a disciplinary warning and her requests to take longer between calls and to reduce the overall number of calls were refused.
She went on to experience panic attacks and was eventually signed off as unfit for work. Her line manager suggested her sick pay should be stopped to “encourage her back to work”. She was entitled to up to 26 weeks’ sick pay, but this was suspended as her line manager felt she was “not helping herself”. This was despite a six-week fit note saying she was unfit for work.
Ms Lynskey raised a grievance and received 13 weeks’ sick pay that had previously been withdrawn. She remained unfit for work due to stress and anxiety and ultimately resigned in May 2023. She brought claims to the Employment Tribunal that she had been constructively dismissed and had been subjected to sex, age and disability discrimination and harassment.
Case Study
Ms Lynskey’s salary was around £20,000 per annum. She was successful in her claims and received compensation of around £65,000 – made up of a hefty injury to feelings award, aggravated damages, interest and loss of earnings. Her line manager was singled out in the Tribunals’ judgment for a “wholesale lack of compassion and understanding”.
This is very much a live issue in the workplace. Employers should consider whether staff are aware of the impact that menopause can have in terms of overall health and wellbeing, but also performance and behaviour. The Tribunal in this case identified at least eight adjustments that could have been made to Ms Lynskey’s role to support her, but were not.
We would recommend seeking advice if you are unsure of your obligations, both medical and legal. Whilst menopause is not a protected characteristic for the purposes of the Equality Act, this case makes clear that the symptoms of menopause are capable of amounting to a disability and the employee should not be treated less favourably, or have a requirement unfairly imposed on them as a result.
For further information or advice in relation to dealing with policies regarding employees experiencing menopausal symptoms, please contact our employment law specialists on 01332 226 155 or fill in the form below.


The Court of Appeal has provided important guidance on the enforceability of training repayment clauses in employment contracts.
Read More

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has clarified when employers may be deemed to have knowledge of an employee's disability.
Read More

Download our probationary period resource pack to help prepare for the Employment Rights Act changes from January 2027.
Read More

An employer's failure to involve an employee in an investigation led to findings of disability discrimination and compensation.
Read More

The EAT highlights the limits of protected conversations and the risks employers face when discussions are handled incorrectly.
Read More

Employer ordered to pay over £264,000 after a reference referring to an ongoing dispute was found to amount to victimisation.
Read More

Download expert guidance on UK trade union reforms and prepare your organisation for Employment Rights Act changes.
Read More

EAT confirms endometriosis can be a disability and examines reasonable adjustments, dismissal risks and performance management issues for employers.
Read More

EAT confirms withdrawing a conditional job offer can breach contract with employers understanding when an offer is binding and notice applies.
Read More

EAT confirms leaving transferred staff on inferior terms can amount to indirect discrimination, even under TUPE.
Read More

EAT confirms dismissal must be based on the employer’s actual reason, not a substitute. Incorrect reasoning can make dismissal unfair.
Read More

EAT finds dismissal unfair in Milrine v DHL (2026). Key lessons for employers on appeal processes and reducing tribunal risk.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top
