Insight
Why data safety and optimisation drive business success
Effective data safety and optimisation are key to business success, reducing risks and improving efficiency in a digital world.
Read moreInsight
In a landmark ruling on January 8, 2025, the European General Court ordered the European Commission (EC) to pay €400 in damages to a German citizen for unlawfully transferring personal data to the U.S. without adequate safeguards.
Although the compensation amount may seem modest, this case, Bindl v European Commission (Case T-354/22), carries profound implications for organisations handling EU citizens’ data. Let’s unpack the key aspects of this decision and what businesses must do to stay compliant with the EU’s strict data transfer regulations.
For the first time, a pan-European court has explicitly awarded non-material damages for violations of data transfer rules. This case illustrates a crucial principle: individuals can seek redress for harm that goes beyond financial loss, such as uncertainty about how their data is processed. The court’s decision is a wake-up call for companies relying on international data flows. Here’s what you need to know:
The case arose when a German citizen used the “Sign in with Facebook” option on the EC’s event registration page. This action triggered the transfer of the user’s IP address to Meta in the U.S. At the time, the EU-US Data Privacy Framework (DPF) had not yet been implemented, and no alternative data transfer mechanism was in place.
The court concluded that the transfer violated Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the data protection framework governing EU institutions, which mirrors the GDPR. The ruling underscores the EC’s failure to ensure adequate protection for the personal data it handled—an oversight any organisation could face without robust compliance measures.
This case serves as a timely reminder for organisations to revisit their data transfer practices
Here’s what you should prioritise:
If your business transfers personal data outside the EU, you must ensure it’s protected by one of the following:
A TIA helps evaluate the legal landscape in the destination country to identify any risks to personal data. This step is essential, even when using SCCs or BCRs.
Maintain records of all data transfer assessments, contracts, and safeguards to demonstrate compliance if challenged by regulators or in court.
Data protection law is evolving rapidly. Monitor developments like this ruling and adapt your practices accordingly.
The court’s recognition of non-material damages as compensable harm under data transfer rules could pave the way for mass claims across the EU. Businesses operating in multiple jurisdictions could face significant liability if they fail to implement compliant data transfer mechanisms.
For example:
This case is a clear signal that regulators and courts are intensifying their focus on data transfers. The potential for class actions and increased enforcement activity means that businesses cannot afford to take compliance lightly.
Whether you’re a small enterprise or a multinational corporation, the stakes are high. Proactively addressing your data protection obligations not only shields your business from costly penalties but also builds trust with your customers.
If you’re unsure where to start or need expert advice tailored to your specific circumstances, we’re here to help. With our extensive experience in GDPR compliance and cross-border data flows, we can guide you through the complexities of EU data protection law, ensuring your business is protected and prepared for the future.
Contact Us
Book a 30-minute FREE consultation or fill in the form below to safeguard your business from the growing risks of non-compliance.
Related Services
Knowledge