ET Ruling on Changing Room Access, Sex, and Gender Reassignment
ET finds indirect sex discrimination where trans woman used female changing rooms, highlighting employer obligations and staff rights.
Read More
The employment tribunal case of Jess Varnish -v- British Cycling tested whether recipients of grants for actively participating in training should be classed as employees of their coaching and funding charities.
11 December 2019
Case Study
Having been recognised as having the potential to take part in British Cycling’s ‘World Class Programme’, Jess Varnish was awarded an annual grant by UK Sport to cycle, with the aim of winning medals for the British team in international competitions.
In return for being selected to participate in the programme, Jess Varnish agreed to be regimented by a training programme, which included details of what she could eat, as well as how, when and where she trained. In addition, British Cycling had a large degree of control over her media appearances and commercial work.
When she was dropped from the programme, Jess Varnish decided to bring claims for wrongful dismissal and sex discrimination in the Employment Tribunal. The Employment Tribunal would only have jurisdiction to hear these claims if she was deemed to be an employee or a worker.
Case Study
The three crucial factors in establishing employee status are control, mutuality of obligation and personal performance.
Given the level of control that British Cycling had over Jess’ lifestyle, the tribunal found that this was sufficient to satisfy the control factor of establishing employee status.
However, because Jess effectively volunteered for the programme with the desire of achieving success, the tribunal found no mutuality of obligation.
The tribunal also found that Jess was not obliged to personally perform any work and that she was merely required to train in the hope of achieving success in international competitions.
Given that two out of the three crucial factors in establishing employee status were missing in Jess’ case, the tribunal concluded that she was not employed by British Cycling. The tribunal also clarified that there was not a tripartite agreement with UK Sport.
This case reinstates the importance of taking care that, when making grants or providing services, the elements of a contract of employment are not present, unless they are intended to be.
To clarify the boundaries between employment statuses for charities, we provide step-by-step guidance, from drafting the initial agreement with the individual, through to managing changes to the relationship as it evolves over time.
Contact Us
For further information and support in establishing employee status, please contact us on 01332 226 149 or complete the form below.
Related Services
Knowledge
ET finds indirect sex discrimination where trans woman used female changing rooms, highlighting employer obligations and staff rights.
Read MoreET dismisses claims over trans women using female toilets, clarifying employer duties and best practice for workplace facilities.
Read MoreET rules on non-binary staff, workplace records, and harassment, clarifying protections under the Equality Act.
Read MoreEmployment Tribunal examines gender critical beliefs, trans rights, and single-sex spaces in landmark Peggie v Fife Health Board case.
Read MoreDownload our Employment Rights Act Resource Pack to navigate key 2025–2027 employment law changes with expert guidance and practical tools.
Read moreEmployee falls asleep at work and is unfairly dismissed; explore lessons for employers on investigations, mitigation, and proportionality.
Read MoreHow employers can handle whistleblowing effectively to reduce risk and prevent escalation, drawing lessons from the Argence-Lafon case.
Read MoreExplore lessons from the Ritchie V Goom Electrical Ltd case on managing conflicting workstyles and age diversity in modern offices.
Read MoreA clear roadmap from our Employment & HR Law team on upcoming Employment Rights Bill changes employers need to prepare for.
Read moreNorman v Lidl: Redundancy scoring based on degree requirement found to be indirect age discrimination, costing the employer over £50,000.
Read MoreA Tribunal ruling may end the two-year limit on backdated holiday pay claims, creating major risks for employers.
Read MoreKennedy v Hendy Group highlights the importance of supporting employees in redundancy and exploring alternative roles fairly.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top
On Monday 29 September, Flint Bishop successfully completed the acquisition of the entire business of Lupton Fawcett LLP. You have been forwarded to the page most relevant to your visit.
Please feel free to explore our website and learn more about our legal services and professionals, including those who have recently joined us from Lupton Fawcett.