PM Law Group Support – Urgent Legal Assistance for Clients Impacted by the Collapse
Need urgent help after PM Law Group’s collapse? Flint Bishop can step in to protect your legal matters and client funds.
Read More
A Court of Appeal case considered whether a will could be disputed before the testator died.
28 November 2018
Insight
The case of Moore v Moore 2016 EWHC 2202 (Ch), which was considered by the Court of Appeal, interestingly found that a father (Roger Moore) could not change his will so as to prevent his son (Stephen Moore) receiving sole ownership of the family farming business (which was owned jointly by Roger and Stephen).
The family farm had been promised to Stephen for many years and it was held that these promises had created an interest in Stephen’s favour, over the farm, which Roger could not now stop.
The court ordered in 2016 that the farming partnership should be dissolved, with Roger’s share of the farm being transferred to Stephen for practical purposes (Roger suffers from Alzheimer’s). It was, however, ordered that Roger and his wife (Stephen’s mother) Pamela Moore should continue to occupy the farmhouse (at Stephen’s expense) and receive an income from the business of £200 per week for as long as they needed.
Pamela acting as Roger’s litigation friend appealed the 2016 judgment. At the hearing, Lord Justice Henderson ordered that there needed to be a further hearing to consider making a lump sum payment to Pamela. There was a suggestion that a payment of between £1m to £2m would be reasonable. The Court considered that Stephen’s eventual inheritance would have been subject to such reasonable provision as Roger might choose to make for Pamela both before and after his death. It found that it was Roger’s clear intention that Pamela should have access to both capital and income after his death and that she should be the sole beneficiary of non-farming assets comprised in the residuary estate. The 2016 judgment left Pamela locked into a financial relationship with her estranged son with few significant resources of her own.
The order that Roger’s share of the farmland and the partnership assets should be transferred to Stephen was upheld on the basis that Roger did not have the capacity to continue to farm during the remainder of his life and Stephen already owned half of the farm and the business and in practice had been running the farming operations for a number of years.
It is not normally possible to dispute a will before a testator has died, there is always the possibility that the testator may change their will before they die. This case was not a will dispute although it did arise because of Roger and Pamela’s decision to disinherit their estranged son. It was a case that sought to enforce a promise made to Stephen throughout his life which Stephen had relied upon to his detriment. Stephen was able to seek to enforce the promise before Roger’s death largely because of Roger’s lack of capacity and inability to continue to operate and run the farming business.
Contact Us
Should you require any advice or information relating to any probate claim you may be involved with, whether as a beneficiary or a testator, please contact us on 01332 226 104 or complete the form below.
Related Services
Knowledge
Need urgent help after PM Law Group’s collapse? Flint Bishop can step in to protect your legal matters and client funds.
Read MoreA practical guide to burial disputes, who decides funeral arrangements, court intervention, and the risks for executors.
Read MoreInheritance disputes are increasing due to wealth, family structure, and planning gaps. Learn what families should know to prevent conflict.
Read MoreWhen probate caveats should be used, when they should not, how they can be challenged, and the risks of getting it wrong.
Read MoreLearn the differences between LPAs and Court of Protection deputyships and why planning ahead matters for your future and family.
Read MoreKey dates and changes under the Renters’ Rights Act: eviction bans, deposit caps, and tenancy reforms from May 2026.
Read MoreDownload our Renters’ Rights Act guide with key dates, compliance tips, and tenancy reforms for landlords and tenants.
Read moreLeft out of a will? Discover your rights under the Inheritance Act, who can claim, and what steps to take to secure fair financial provision.
Read MoreElder financial abuse is rising. Learn how to spot missing assets, understand undue influence, and what executors and beneficiaries can do to protect an estate.
Read MoreNeed probate to claim the £210,000 infected blood compensation payment? Our probate solicitors can help apply for a Grant of Probate and recover legal costs.
Read MoreThe Renters’ Rights Act 2025 reshapes England’s private rental sector, strengthening tenant rights and raising property standards.
Read MorePractical checklist to help landlords and property managers comply with the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 and new tenancy regulations.
Read moreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top
On Monday 29 September, Flint Bishop successfully completed the acquisition of the entire business of Lupton Fawcett LLP. You have been forwarded to the page most relevant to your visit.
Please feel free to explore our website and learn more about our legal services and professionals, including those who have recently joined us from Lupton Fawcett.