Mr C Okoro v Bidvest Noonan (UK) Ltd: What does the law say about employees who fall asleep at work?
Employee falls asleep at work and is unfairly dismissed; explore lessons for employers on investigations, mitigation, and proportionality.
Read MoreThe case of Hunter v Lidl underscores the consequences of ineffective policies, emphasising the need for a proactive approach to creating a workplace culture that actively prevents and addresses harassment.
26 January 2024
Case Study
We always talk about the importance of training staff on equality in the workplace, and the case of Hunter v Lidl is a classic example of why employers MUST ensure that policies are well publicized, enforced, and adhered to.
Miss Hunter began work for Lidl as a teenager and was not made aware of any internal policies. Almost immediately, she was subjected to unwanted physical contact and inappropriate comments from colleagues. When she raised this with the store Hunter v Lidl manager, she was told to “take it as a compliment,” and the matter proceeded no further.
The comments continued, and she had her bottom slapped, and her thighs and waist touched. A deputy store manager made comments about her underwear, her physical appearance, and the desire to have sex with her. No action was taken against the deputy manager, and the employee resigned, claiming constructive dismissal and sexual harassment.
The Employment Tribunal found that she had been harassed and that despite Lidl having a policy that stated such behaviour was not tolerated, a culture of lewd remarks and unwanted contact had, in fact, become commonplace.
Case Study
The ET concluded that the policy was ineffective in controlling employee behaviour, and a lack of training and awareness had allowed this to happen.
The harasser claimed not to have known that their behaviour was offensive, and while the ET accepted this, the offence is still made out because the intention is not relevant where the behaviour causes an intimidating and humiliating environment. Adequate training would have addressed this.
The compensatory award of £50,884 included a hefty £22,000 injury to feelings award, which is at the high end of the middle band. When the Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 comes into force later in 2024, this type of case could have an additional 25% uplift in compensation applied.
The legislation, which is due to come into force in October, will place a new requirement on employers to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment from happening in their workplace. Failure to do so will mean enforcement action by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission and significant increases in compensation (including an uplift in associated claims for multiple forms of harassment, e.g., age and/or sexual orientation).
Contact Us
For further information or advice in dealing with harassment in the workplace, please contact our employment law specialists on 01332 226 155 or fill in the form below.
Related Services
Knowledge
Employee falls asleep at work and is unfairly dismissed; explore lessons for employers on investigations, mitigation, and proportionality.
Read MoreHow employers can handle whistleblowing effectively to reduce risk and prevent escalation, drawing lessons from the Argence-Lafon case.
Read MoreExplore lessons from the Ritchie V Goom Electrical Ltd case on managing conflicting workstyles and age diversity in modern offices.
Read MoreThursday
27
November
Join our expert-led webinar on the Employment Rights Act and discover what every HR professional needs to know before it takes effect.
Book your placeA clear roadmap from our Employment & HR Law team on upcoming Employment Rights Bill changes employers need to prepare for.
Read moreNorman v Lidl: Redundancy scoring based on degree requirement found to be indirect age discrimination, costing the employer over £50,000.
Read MoreA Tribunal ruling may end the two-year limit on backdated holiday pay claims, creating major risks for employers.
Read MoreKennedy v Hendy Group highlights the importance of supporting employees in redundancy and exploring alternative roles fairly.
Read MoreTeacher unfairly dismissed due to trade union activity and disability. The Tribunal awarded £370K in this landmark case.
Read MoreWatson v Roke Manor Research Ltd shows how non-verbal managerial behaviour can amount to discrimination and have legal risks for employers.
Read MoreCan external HR consultants be held liable for dismissal decisions? We review Handa v Station Hotel & Others for key lessons.
Read MoreEAT confirms employers can avoid liability for harassment if they take reasonable steps like EDI training and reinforcing workplace values.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top


On Monday 29 September, Flint Bishop successfully completed the acquisition of the entire business of Lupton Fawcett LLP. You have been forwarded to the page most relevant to your visit.
Please feel free to explore our website and learn more about our legal services and professionals, including those who have recently joined us from Lupton Fawcett.
