Government consultations launched on four key areas of change to be brought in by the Employment Rights Act
Employment Rights Act changes: Government consults on bereavement leave, dismissal protections, and trade union rights.
Read MoreQuite often, employers think that in order for discrimination to occur, the discriminatory treatment must be overtly obvious.
6 June 2018
Insight
Many employers believe that in a disability discrimination case, the employee must have been treated badly because of something that is very obvious to do with the employee’s disability, however, this is not necessarily always the case.
Much more often, potential discriminatory treatment is much more subtle and can occur completely innocently on the part of the employer. The following case illustrates this very principle.
Mr Grosset was a teacher who suffered from cystic fibrosis, which his employer, the City of York Council, knew about. He was under increasing pressure at work which was compounded by the time-consuming exercise regime his condition required.
During this time, Mr Grosset showed an 18-rated film to a class of 15-year-olds without approval from the school or parents. He was ultimately dismissed for this reason.
Mr Grosset brought a claim for disability discrimination and was successful. The reasoning was that medical evidence (which was not available to the employer at the time of the disciplinary hearing) showed that Mr Grosset’s mental state was impaired at the time of the incident due to stress which arose from his disability (i.e. his cystic fibrosis).
The Tribunal accepted that, because of the stress Mr Grosset was under, he made an error in judgment in showing the film. In turn, therefore, the reason that Mr Grosset was dismissed was that of something that arose in consequence of his disability (i.e. stress).
The Tribunal decided that dismissal was not justified because a formal written warning would have been sufficient to achieve the employer’s legitimate aim of safeguarding children.
The Tribunal’s decision was upheld by both the Employment Appeal Tribunal and the Court of Appeal. It was made clear that, even if the employer does not actually know that there is a link between the disability and the misconduct, this does not matter for the purposes of the claim as the question of whether there has been unfavourable treatment arising from something to do with disability is an objection question and therefore a matter of fact.
If you are faced with an employee that has a potential disability, you should always turn your mind to whether the disability could in any way whatsoever have had a bearing on whatever the employee has done. Even if you do not think that it could have, it is always advisable to speak to the employee about it and obtain medical evidence. Ignorance is not a defence and it is always better to go into something with your eyes open and knowing the whole picture.
Contact Us
If you require any further information regarding this employment law case, please contact us on 01332 226 149 or complete the form below.
Related Services
Knowledge
Employment Rights Act changes: Government consults on bereavement leave, dismissal protections, and trade union rights.
Read MoreProbation periods will be crucial as the Employment Rights Bill introduces day-one unfair dismissal protections from 2027.
Read MoreThursday
27
November
Join our expert-led webinar on the Employment Rights Act and discover what every HR professional needs to know before it takes effect.
Book your placeA clear roadmap from our Employment & HR Law team on upcoming Employment Rights Bill changes employers need to prepare for.
Read moreEmployment Tribunal deadlines are set to increase to six months. Learn how this change could affect employers and what steps to take now.
Read MoreThe Fair Work Agency (FWA) launches in 2026, enforcing holiday pay rights with new powers and hefty penalties for employers.
Read MoreLatest updates on the Employment Rights Bill. Stay informed and prepare your business for upcoming legal changes.
Read MoreDiscover the Employment Rights Bill Roadmap with key implementation dates and how employers can prepare for upcoming changes.
Read MoreUnderstand the legal risks and responsibilities of using AI in the workplace with our guide to best practices in employment law.
Read MoreCelebrate Pride Month by reflecting on LGBTQIA+ history, promoting year-round inclusion, and understanding your legal responsibilities.
Read MoreTwo Tribunal cases highlight the risks of poor communication, impulsive reactions, and ignoring workplace culture.
Read MoreNew neonatal care leave laws are now in force. We break down the key guidance for employers from the Government and Acas.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top


On Monday 29 September, Flint Bishop successfully completed the acquisition of the entire business of Lupton Fawcett LLP. You have been forwarded to the page most relevant to your visit.
Please feel free to explore our website and learn more about our legal services and professionals, including those who have recently joined us from Lupton Fawcett.
