Gender Pay Gap and Menopause Action Plans: What’s Changing and When
Employers can voluntarily publish menopause and gender pay gap action plans from April 2026 ahead of the 2027 legal requirement.
Read MoreQuite often, employers think that in order for discrimination to occur, the discriminatory treatment must be overtly obvious.
6 June 2018
Insight
Many employers believe that in a disability discrimination case, the employee must have been treated badly because of something that is very obvious to do with the employee’s disability, however, this is not necessarily always the case.
Much more often, potential discriminatory treatment is much more subtle and can occur completely innocently on the part of the employer. The following case illustrates this very principle.
Mr Grosset was a teacher who suffered from cystic fibrosis, which his employer, the City of York Council, knew about. He was under increasing pressure at work which was compounded by the time-consuming exercise regime his condition required.
During this time, Mr Grosset showed an 18-rated film to a class of 15-year-olds without approval from the school or parents. He was ultimately dismissed for this reason.
Mr Grosset brought a claim for disability discrimination and was successful. The reasoning was that medical evidence (which was not available to the employer at the time of the disciplinary hearing) showed that Mr Grosset’s mental state was impaired at the time of the incident due to stress which arose from his disability (i.e. his cystic fibrosis).
The Tribunal accepted that, because of the stress Mr Grosset was under, he made an error in judgment in showing the film. In turn, therefore, the reason that Mr Grosset was dismissed was that of something that arose in consequence of his disability (i.e. stress).
The Tribunal decided that dismissal was not justified because a formal written warning would have been sufficient to achieve the employer’s legitimate aim of safeguarding children.
The Tribunal’s decision was upheld by both the Employment Appeal Tribunal and the Court of Appeal. It was made clear that, even if the employer does not actually know that there is a link between the disability and the misconduct, this does not matter for the purposes of the claim as the question of whether there has been unfavourable treatment arising from something to do with disability is an objection question and therefore a matter of fact.
If you are faced with an employee that has a potential disability, you should always turn your mind to whether the disability could in any way whatsoever have had a bearing on whatever the employee has done. Even if you do not think that it could have, it is always advisable to speak to the employee about it and obtain medical evidence. Ignorance is not a defence and it is always better to go into something with your eyes open and knowing the whole picture.
Contact Us
If you require any further information regarding this employment law case, please contact us on 01332 226 149 or complete the form below.
Related Services
Knowledge
Employers can voluntarily publish menopause and gender pay gap action plans from April 2026 ahead of the 2027 legal requirement.
Read MoreUnderstand SSP 2026 updates, employer responsibilities, and common pitfalls to keep your business compliant and protect staff rights.
Read MoreEAT confirms employers should assess redundancies forward-looking, not retrospectively, when deciding if collective consultation is needed.
Read MoreLearn the 2026 National Minimum Wage rates, common employer pitfalls, and how to stay compliant with new Fair Work Agency rules.
Read MoreERA 2025 reforms take effect February 2026, changing industrial action rules, employee protections, and union obligations.
Read MoreTuesday
25
March
Join us for breakfast and networking, followed by our expert speaker presentation, a roundtable discussion, and a Q&A session.
Book your placeWednesday
26
March
Employment law update on family leave rights for 2026. Practical guidance, new entitlements and live Q&A for employers.
Book your placeWednesday
11
March
Join us on 11 March 2026 for our Employment Law Seminar: key changes, tribunal cases, and expert insights for HR professionals.
Book your placeWith colder weather and the risk of snow, employers must consider their responsibilities during hazardous conditions.
Read MoreDownload our Employment Rights Act Resource Pack to navigate key 2025–2027 employment law changes with expert guidance and practical tools.
Read moreEmployment Law 2025 review covering key legislative changes, consultations and what employers need to prepare for in 2026.
Read MoreUpdate on the Employment Rights Bill, including the removal of day-one rights, a new six-month qualifying period, and potential compensation changes.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top


On Monday 29 September, Flint Bishop successfully completed the acquisition of the entire business of Lupton Fawcett LLP. You have been forwarded to the page most relevant to your visit.
Please feel free to explore our website and learn more about our legal services and professionals, including those who have recently joined us from Lupton Fawcett.
