Gender Pay Gap and Menopause Action Plans: What’s Changing and When
Employers can voluntarily publish menopause and gender pay gap action plans from April 2026 ahead of the 2027 legal requirement.
Read MoreCan a Tribunal consider the validity of a Final Written Warning when assessing the fairness of a dismissal?
24 February 2014
Insight
A court case in 2014 has again raised a question which is important for employers to consider when carrying out disciplinary procedures with an employee: can the validity of an earlier final written warning be considered when assessing the fairness of a dismissal?
It is fair to say that most employers are mindful of the need to follow a correct and fair procedure when it comes to dismissing an employee, but the case has emphasised the need for this thorough approach to also be applied to disciplinary proceedings where a final written warning is a more likely outcome. Does it raise the question, how sure are you that your supervisors and managers further down the chain of command are aware of the need to follow the correct procedures in all aspects of disciplinary procedures?
A case has highlighted the need for fairness, not just at the dismissal stage, but throughout earlier stages of a disciplinary process. It is essential that a final written warning is issued fairly if you intend to rely on it in the future to justify the dismissal of an employee.
In Adegobola v Marks and Spencer Plc, the Tribunal found that it had no jurisdiction to consider whether a final written warning issued to an employee prior to their dismissal was unfair. The Tribunal argued that any appeal hearing and later investigation by the employer would have cured any defect in earlier disciplinary procedures. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed employee’s claims for unfair dismissal.
The employee subsequently appealed this ruling to the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT), which was again dismissed. The employee then further appealed to the Court of Appeal.
The Court of Appeal held that the original Tribunal was wrong and that it is appropriate for a Tribunal to consider earlier final written warnings when deciding the fairness of a dismissal. The moral of this case is that employers should follow a fair and reasonable procedure at all stages of the disciplinary process. If not, the risk is that you could later face a claim for unfair dismissal.
Contact Us
For employment law support, please contact us on 01332 226 149 or complete the form below.
Related Services
Knowledge
Employers can voluntarily publish menopause and gender pay gap action plans from April 2026 ahead of the 2027 legal requirement.
Read MoreUnderstand SSP 2026 updates, employer responsibilities, and common pitfalls to keep your business compliant and protect staff rights.
Read MoreEAT confirms employers should assess redundancies forward-looking, not retrospectively, when deciding if collective consultation is needed.
Read MoreLearn the 2026 National Minimum Wage rates, common employer pitfalls, and how to stay compliant with new Fair Work Agency rules.
Read MoreERA 2025 reforms take effect February 2026, changing industrial action rules, employee protections, and union obligations.
Read MoreTuesday
25
March
Join us for breakfast and networking, followed by our expert speaker presentation, a roundtable discussion, and a Q&A session.
Book your placeWednesday
26
March
Employment law update on family leave rights for 2026. Practical guidance, new entitlements and live Q&A for employers.
Book your placeWednesday
11
March
Join us on 11 March 2026 for our Employment Law Seminar: key changes, tribunal cases, and expert insights for HR professionals.
Book your placeWith colder weather and the risk of snow, employers must consider their responsibilities during hazardous conditions.
Read MoreDownload our Employment Rights Act Resource Pack to navigate key 2025–2027 employment law changes with expert guidance and practical tools.
Read moreEmployment Law 2025 review covering key legislative changes, consultations and what employers need to prepare for in 2026.
Read MoreUpdate on the Employment Rights Bill, including the removal of day-one rights, a new six-month qualifying period, and potential compensation changes.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top


On Monday 29 September, Flint Bishop successfully completed the acquisition of the entire business of Lupton Fawcett LLP. You have been forwarded to the page most relevant to your visit.
Please feel free to explore our website and learn more about our legal services and professionals, including those who have recently joined us from Lupton Fawcett.
