The importance of the disciplinary appeal process: Milrine v DHL (2026)
EAT finds dismissal unfair in Milrine v DHL (2026). Key lessons for employers on appeal processes and reducing tribunal risk.
Read More
In the case of Ineos Infrastructure Grangemouth Ltd -v- Jones & Others [2022] EAT 82, the employer was found to have breached the collective bargaining regulations in its response to union actions.
20 September 2022
Case Study
When negotiating with a trade union representing employees, organisations are required to comply with the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA).
Union members at Ineos had been represented by Unite, campaigning for improvements to pay.
After several months of negotiation, Ineos offered a 2.8% pay increase. The union (Unite) presented the offer to their members, who instructed Unite to seek an increased offer. In response, Ineos contacted all staff to inform them that it was unilaterally imposing the 2.8% pay increase. Ineos also announced that it was terminating collective bargaining with Unite.
Subsequently, the affected employees brought claims for unlawful inducement.
Case Study
Section 145B of TULRCA prohibits employers from inducing workers to bypass ongoing collective bargaining.
The Employment Tribunal decided that Ineos had breached section 145B. The employer appealed, arguing that imposing the offer where negotiations had ended was lawful. The EAT dismissed Ineos’ appeal, finding that the negotiations had not yet ended and the parties had been close to reaching an agreement. The EAT held that the employer was inducing staff to cease collective bargaining by imposing the pay increase prior to pay negotiations ending.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) confirmed that by implementing a pay award before completing negotiations with the Trade Union, an employer had breached TULRCA.
Compensation of £3,830 per Unite member at the company was ordered.
When undertaking collective bargaining or implementing changes to terms and conditions of employment, it is essential for employers to be wary of regulations and employee rights.
A previous case known as Kostal (Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and others [2021] UKSC 47) also established that employers can move away from collective bargaining and offers be made, but only if the collective bargaining process has been properly concluded, and even then, employers should not purposefully thwart the collective bargaining process (as this may still have the effect of indirectly bypassing collective bargaining).
Here are some important questions to ask before implementing a new pay offer after trade union negotiations:
Contact Us
For expert advice on negotiating with trade unions, please contact our team of expert employment law and HR lawyers on 01332 226 155 or fill in the form below.
Related Services
Knowledge
EAT finds dismissal unfair in Milrine v DHL (2026). Key lessons for employers on appeal processes and reducing tribunal risk.
Read MoreTuesday
25
March
Join us for breakfast and networking, followed by our expert speaker presentation, a roundtable discussion, and a Q&A session.
Book your placeWednesday
26
March
Employment law update on family leave rights for 2026. Practical guidance, new entitlements and live Q&A for employers.
Book your placeET finds indirect sex discrimination where trans woman used female changing rooms, highlighting employer obligations and staff rights.
Read MoreET dismisses claims over trans women using female toilets, clarifying employer duties and best practice for workplace facilities.
Read MoreET rules on non-binary staff, workplace records, and harassment, clarifying protections under the Equality Act.
Read MoreEmployment Tribunal examines gender critical beliefs, trans rights, and single-sex spaces in landmark Peggie v Fife Health Board case.
Read MoreWednesday
11
March
Join us on 11 March 2026 for our Employment Law Seminar: key changes, tribunal cases, and expert insights for HR professionals.
Book your placeDownload our Employment Rights Act Resource Pack to navigate key 2025–2027 employment law changes with expert guidance and practical tools.
Read moreEmployee falls asleep at work and is unfairly dismissed; explore lessons for employers on investigations, mitigation, and proportionality.
Read MoreHow employers can handle whistleblowing effectively to reduce risk and prevent escalation, drawing lessons from the Argence-Lafon case.
Read MoreExplore lessons from the Ritchie V Goom Electrical Ltd case on managing conflicting workstyles and age diversity in modern offices.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top
On Monday 29 September, Flint Bishop successfully completed the acquisition of the entire business of Lupton Fawcett LLP. You have been forwarded to the page most relevant to your visit.
Please feel free to explore our website and learn more about our legal services and professionals, including those who have recently joined us from Lupton Fawcett.