We provide the complete commercial debt recovery service; from outsourced early arrears collections through to expert litigation, all handled in-house by a multi-award-winning law firm.

 

Visit our debt recovery website

In this case, Messum v Bradford Management Services (Bradford), the discrimination of Mrs Messum whilst pregnant and on return from maternity leave resulted in significant compensation.

Unreasonable change of duties

In Messum v Bradford Management Services, Mrs Messum, a qualified and respected member of the HR team, saw a change in her regular duties after announcing her pregnancy. The change saw duties involving heavy lifting introduced. Mrs Messum’s manager also began to question her performance for the first time. After being signed off sick with stress and pregnancy related fatigue, Mrs Messum’s employer failed to pay her sick pay.

The maltreatment continued. Shortly after, Mrs Messum was called to an investigation meeting, with no detail of the meeting provided. When she submitted a sick note to inform her employer that she was not well enough to attend, her employer kickstarted her maternity leave early.

Just eight weeks after giving birth, Mrs Messum’s employer once again called an investigatory meeting, with a threat that disciplinary action would follow if she did not attend. When Mrs Messum informed Bradford that – given her full commitment to the care of her child – she was unable to attend, they suggested that the meeting take place in her home. She was subsequently issued with a warning for a false allegation of stealing food, without recourse to a disciplinary process.

Return to work

On her return to work, rather than assuming her previous HR role, Mrs Messum was assigned unrelated tasks such as housekeeping duties, including cleaning toilets. She eventually resigned, claiming pregnancy/maternity discrimination, harassment and unfair (constructive) dismissal.

Mrs Messum succeeded in each of these claims, with the tribunal awarding £18,000 for injury to feelings, plus a 25% uplift for failure to adhere to ACAS procedures. Her total compensation exceeded £32,000.

Practical implications for employers 

  • Update outdated attitudes – This case is an unfortunate reminder that outdated attitudes of some employers towards women and their fertility/life choices still exist. The outcome of this case indicates the dangers of not adopting a contemporary attitude relating to pregnancy and maternity.
  • Understand the legal landscape – Of course, many employers do get it right, and the legal landscape in this area has been established for some time. If you need help in understanding your obligations as an employer in these circumstances, or wish to offer your staff training to ensure pregnant employees and employees returning from maternity leave are treated fairly and lawfully, please do get in touch.
Please note that this information is for general guidance only and should not substitute professional legal advice. If you have specific concerns, we recommend consulting with our one of our legal experts.
SHARE

Share

Scroll to next section

Scroll back to the top