For more information about this case, or how our Insurance Litigation team defends insurers and self-insured organisations against fraudulent motor claims, please contact us on 01332 226 109 or complete the form below.
Conveyancing
Explore All ConveyancingCriminal Defence
Explore All Criminal DefenceEstate Planning
Explore All Estate PlanningEstate Administraion
Explore All Estate AdministraionDispute Resolution
Explore All Dispute ResolutionFamily & Matrimonial
Explore All Family & MatrimonialMotoring & Driving Offences
Explore All Motoring & Driving OffencesResidential Property
Explore All Residential PropertyResidential Property Disputes
Explore All Residential Property DisputesWills, Trusts & Estate Disputes
Explore All Wills, Trusts & Estate DisputesAgriculture
Explore All AgricultureBusiness Recovery
Explore All Business RecoveryCharities & social enterprises
Explore All Charities & social enterprisesCommercial Disputes
Explore All Commercial DisputesCommercial Law & Contracts
Explore All Commercial Law & ContractsCommercial Property
Explore All Commercial PropertyCorporate & Finance
Explore All Corporate & FinanceData Protection
Explore All Data ProtectionDebt Services
Explore All Debt ServicesEcclesiastical Law
Explore All Ecclesiastical LawEducation Law
Explore All Education LawEmployment Law
Explore All Employment LawFamily Businesses
Explore All Family BusinessesFinance Dispute Resolution
Explore All Finance Dispute ResolutionFinancial & Business Crime
Explore All Financial & Business CrimeInsurance Litigation
Explore All Insurance LitigationIntellectual Property
Explore All Intellectual PropertyLicensing
Explore All LicensingRegulatory & Corporate Defence
Explore All Regulatory & Corporate Defence
How video evidence proved vital in establishing whether a fraudulent incident claim was engineered through a deliberate road traffic incident, saving our insurance client £23k.
9 October 2019
Case Study
Our insurance client’s policyholder (the defendant) was stationary at red traffic lights behind the claimant’s vehicle.
Upon the lights changing to green, the claimant drove around the corner out of sight, before suddenly braking and coming to a complete stop.
This completely unnecessary act resulted in the defendant colliding with the rear of the claimant’s vehicle.
Given that there was no reason for the claimant to carry out this dangerous manoeuvre, the defendant decided to film the confrontation with the claimant that followed. The video evidence shows a dispute arising when the defendant questioned the four occupants of the claimant vehicle as to who was driving at the time.
No one was willing to take responsibility for being the driver, and they all refused to confirm whether they held a driving licence.
Case Study
At trial, the claimant was described by the judge as an “unimpressive witness” and was found to have provided false information to the credit hire company.
The judge described the defendant and their witness as “honest”, before accepting their evidence and concluding that whoever was driving the claimant’s vehicle at the time of the incident deliberately slammed on their brakes.
The judge made a finding of fundamental dishonesty against the claimant resulting in a saving of £23k for our insurance client, in addition to recovering over £6k in costs.
A solicitor from our Insurance Litigation team commented on this case:
“Alongside the video footage, there were numerous inconsistencies that arose throughout the process, as well as procedural breaches that further obstructed the claim. The outcome of this case is testament to the great results our specialist fraud team and credit hire teams regularly achieve for our insurance clients.”
For more information about this case, or how our Insurance Litigation team defends insurers and self-insured organisations against fraudulent motor claims, please contact us on 01332 226 109 or complete the form below.
Related Services


A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal case demonstrates some of the issues that may arise in a voluntary redundancy situation.
Read More

Flint Bishop and InterAssista have collaboratively defended a complex cross-border insurance claim.
Read More

Claimant found fundamentally dishonest after pretending to be a passenger in vehicle, as he could not get the accident circumstances or location correct.
Read More

Insurance Litigation Associate, Paul Large, secures another finding of fundamental dishonesty.
Read More

Fundamental dishonesty ruling results in a £10k saving for our insurer client.
Read More

The courts ruled a finding of fundamental dishonesty against a director of BR Motors Services Ltd resulting in our insurer client being awarded £8,000…
Read More

Successful defence for an insurer client against a case involving a claim for a credit hire vehicle following a road traffic accident.
Read More

Paul Bayliss, successfully saved our insurer client in excess of £1.6m in a case brought about by a 17-year-old immigrant who was knocked from…
Read More

Senior associate, Philip Thompson, successfully obtains six-figure compensation award for a Derby resident involved in a catastrophic personal injury accident.
Read More

Another great result achieved by our Insurance Litigation team, saving our insurer client over £40,000 in damages in a recent credit hire matter.
Read More

The case details the work our Insurance Litigation team carried out for one of our insurer clients, who was facing a pleaded schedule of…
Read More

How our Insurance Litigation team used social media activity, medical reports and financial analysis to deliver a tactical Part 36 offer.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top
