Sick Pay Rights 2026: What Employers Need to Know
Understand SSP 2026 updates, employer responsibilities, and common pitfalls to keep your business compliant and protect staff rights.
Read More
Ofsted inspections can be very sensitive for education providers, particularly for multi-academy trusts where schools are not improving.
This often results in the leadership team facing public criticism and receiving very little sympathy.
9 September 2019
Insight
Trusts may wish to make leadership changes in response to Ofsted inspections, but is it fair to do so?
The employment tribunal case of Mannix -v- Plymouth CAST assessed whether it was fair to dismiss a senior leader within a mutli-academy trust due to a poor Ofsted rating. This case demonstrates the importance of seeking robust legal advice and support before significant decisions about changes following an Ofsted inspection are reached.
Shortly after Mr. Mannix’s appointment as Chief Executive at Plymouth CAST, he predicted that poor Ofsted inspections would be a risk for the 36 schools within the multi-academy trust.
Concerns were expressed early into Mr. Mannix’s employment by the regional schools commissioner, who was concerned about the accountability structure of the multi-academy trust.
Once the Ofsted review began and early indications suggested that there was an issue with leadership in the school, the Bishop of Plymouth, Bishop Mark O’Toole, met with the regional schools commissioner, who strongly criticised Mr. Mannix’s ability to retrieve the multi-academy trust from the damming results of the report.
As a highly-influential member of its board, Bishop O’Toole dismissed Mr. Mannix following a series of events.
The tribunal concluded that Bishop O’Toole dismissed Mr. Mannix based almost entirely on his meeting with the regional schools commissioner and that he had used his influence to remove and replace Mr. Mannix to preserve the reputation of the trust and to satisfy the regional schools commissioner.
In defence, Plymouth CAST claimed that the damming Ofsted result had destroyed their trust and confidence in Mr. Mannix.
The tribunal found that the trust did not appraise or investigate Mr. Mannix’s performance, nor did they ask him whether he agreed with the report or discuss responding to it, so the trust had not demonstrated reasonable grounds to believe that Mr. Mannix lacked capability.
As the trust failed to properly investigate the findings of the Ofsted report, the tribunal also concluded that the trust could not dismiss Mr. Mannix based on a loss of trust and confidence, as he had no opportunity to respond to the views of Ofsted or the regional schools commissioner.
With all grounds for dismissal considered inadequate, the tribunal concluded that the dismissal was unfair. The tribunal also found that the trust was liable for Mr. Mannix’s costs.
In summary, in certain circumstances, it may be in the best interests of a trust to dismiss senior personnel. However, ensuring that the correct procedures have been followed and the relevant evidence obtained before decisions are reached, protects the education provider from potential tribunal claims.
Had Plymouth CAST carried out an investigation, they may well have been able to fairly dismiss Mr Mannix on capability grounds or for loss of trust and confidence.
Contact Us
With extensive experience in supporting multi-academy trusts throughout internal dismissal procedures and investigations throughout the UK, we minimise your risks by providing robust advice that ensures your organisation is protected. For more information and support, contact us on 01332 226 149 or complete the form below.
Related Services
Knowledge
Understand SSP 2026 updates, employer responsibilities, and common pitfalls to keep your business compliant and protect staff rights.
Read MoreEAT confirms employers should assess redundancies forward-looking, not retrospectively, when deciding if collective consultation is needed.
Read MoreLearn the 2026 National Minimum Wage rates, common employer pitfalls, and how to stay compliant with new Fair Work Agency rules.
Read MoreERA 2025 reforms take effect February 2026, changing industrial action rules, employee protections, and union obligations.
Read MoreTuesday
25
March
Join us for breakfast and networking, followed by our expert speaker presentation, a roundtable discussion, and a Q&A session.
Book your placeWednesday
26
March
Employment law update on family leave rights for 2026. Practical guidance, new entitlements and live Q&A for employers.
Book your placeWednesday
11
March
Join us on 11 March 2026 for our Employment Law Seminar: key changes, tribunal cases, and expert insights for HR professionals.
Book your placeWith colder weather and the risk of snow, employers must consider their responsibilities during hazardous conditions.
Read MoreDownload our Employment Rights Act Resource Pack to navigate key 2025–2027 employment law changes with expert guidance and practical tools.
Read moreEmployment Law 2025 review covering key legislative changes, consultations and what employers need to prepare for in 2026.
Read MoreUpdate on the Employment Rights Bill, including the removal of day-one rights, a new six-month qualifying period, and potential compensation changes.
Read MoreTop HR Christmas tips to manage staff absence, festive parties, and workplace closures, ensuring a compliant and enjoyable festive season.
Read MoreScroll to next section
Scroll back to the top
On Monday 29 September, Flint Bishop successfully completed the acquisition of the entire business of Lupton Fawcett LLP. You have been forwarded to the page most relevant to your visit.
Please feel free to explore our website and learn more about our legal services and professionals, including those who have recently joined us from Lupton Fawcett.